Delhi High Court

Shyam Singh Vs. State

(JASMEET SINGH, J.)

2025 III AD (DELHI) 102

Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sec. 363 —Punishment for kidnapping.—Sec, 366, 376 of IPC, 1860- Kidnapping, abducting or inducing woman to compel her marriage, etc.— Rape— Section 4 —Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012-Punishment for penetrative sexual assault-Section 164, 313—CrPC, 1973—Recording of confessions and statements- Power to examine the accused- Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015—Sec.94 —Persumption and determination of age-Prosecution has not been able to prove the age of prosecutrix beyond the reasonable doubt and hence, the benefit of doubt has to accrue to the appellant- Impugned judgement set aside- Appeal disposed.
Held: (Paras- 8,9,10,12,18,19,24,34, 38,39,40,42,43)
Result: Appeal disposed.

Lali Vs. State NCT of Delhi

(MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.)<br />

2025 III AD (DELHI) 94

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 —Sec. 21, 50, 52A , 37 —Punishment for contravention in relation to manufactured drugs and preparations-Conditions under which search of persons shall be conducted.- Disposal of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances-Offences to be cognizable and non-bailable-Applicant is directed to be released on bail upon providing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety-conditions-case is purely for the purposes of deciding the question of grant of bail and shall not be construed as an expression on merits of the matter-Petition and application disposed of.
Held: (Paras- 3,8,9,10,12,15,16,17,19)
Result: Petition disposed.

Rudra Kumar Verma Vs. State of NCT of Delhi

(MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J.)

2025 III AD (DELHI) 58

Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — Sec. 483 - Special powers of High Court or Court of Session regarding bail- Indian Penal Code, 1860— Sec. 408,420,468,471, 120-B, 109 Criminal breach of trust by clerk or servant— Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property— Forgery for purpose of cheating— Using as genuine a forged document or electronic record — Criminal Conspiracy— Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence and when no express provision is made for its punishment-Section 41, 161, 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973- When police may arrest without warrant.-Examination of witnesses by police— Proclamation of person absconding-Applicant is directed to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond subject to the conditions-Petition disposed.
Held: (Paras- 5,10,12,16,17,23, 26,27,32,34,36)
Result: Petition allowed.

MD Heydaitullah Vs. National Investigation Agency

(PRATHIBA M. SINGH, AMIT SHARMA, JJ.)<br />

2025 III AD (DELHI) 38

Code of criminal Procedure, 1973 —Sec. 482— National Investigation Act, 2008 — Sec. 21(4)— Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sec. 120B, 124A, 153A & 153B — Criminal conspiracy — Sedition — Promoting enmity between different groups on ground of religion, race, place of birth, residence — Imputation assertions prejudicial to national integration — Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 — Sec. 17, 18, 18-B, 38, 39, 40 & 43D(5) - Raising funds for terrorist act — Conspiracy, etc. - Recruiting of any person or persons for terrorist act —Offence relating to membership of terrorist organisation - Offence relating to support given to terrorist organisation - Offence of raising fund for terrorist organization - Modified application of certain provisions of Code - Bail —Non-grant of - Challenged - To assess & find justifications for grant or non-grant of bail, material collected & filed along with chargesheet by NIA needs to be examined —Prosecution relied on chats retrieved from devices seized from Appellant, to establish its case qua Appellant for offences for which he has been charged - Chats indicate, Appellant keen on Jihad & wants to establish Khilafat— He was not just passive supporter of ISIS, but was determined to further its activities by influencing other individuals at various platforms - PDFs & videos found describing methods of preparing explosives & bombs - He was member of groups dealing with guns & 3-D printing of weapons/guns - He took oath in name of well-known leader of ISIS — Appellant is asking other persons for finding way to reach Dawlah & not other way around - He is educated & aware of nature of activities of ISIS - He was trying to recruit individuals on online groups for such acts - S. 43(D)(5) is applicable - Impugned order warrants no interference.Held; (Paras 41, 42, 45, 49, 50, 53, 54, 56 & 57)
Result: Appeal dismissed.

Peithvi Singh Yadav Vs. CBI

(MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.)

2025 III AD (DELHI) 26

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988— Sec. 7,13(1)(d),13(2), 20 — Offence relating to public servant being bribed.— Criminal misconduct by a public servant—Presumption where public servant accepts any undue advantage —Sec. 313, 161 Cr.P.C., 1973— Power to examine the accused- Examination of witnesses by police- M. Narsinga Rao v. State of A.P., (2001) 1 SCC 691- "documents" as defined in Sec. 3 — the Evidence Act, 1872— Allegations against the appellant under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of PC Act are not conclusively proved-Appellant's conviction set aside- Appeal allowed.
Held: (Paras- 9,12,13,19,20,24,25,29,30)
Result: Appeal allowed.

Copyright © 2022 Apex Decisions Software, All rights Reserved. Designed By Techdost