Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sec. 302,34, 201 — Bhartatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 —- Sec. 103 (1)/3(5)—Indian Evidence Act, 1872 — Sec. 106 —Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023- ec. 109 — written report of the incident was lodged before the Station House Officer, Police Station alleging that he was sleeping in the drawing room of his house with his son-almirah situated near the dead body was lying open, and a sum of approximately Rs. 4 lakh was missing —some unknown persons had murdered his wife by inflicting injuries on her head and requested the police to take action- Electronic records being more susceptible to tampering, alteration, transposition, excision, etc. without such safeguards, the whole trial based on proof of electronic records can lead to travesty of justice-Oral evidence in the place of such certificate cannot possibly suffice— guilt of the appellant.

Indian Penal Code, 1860 —Sec. 120B, 161 —Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Sec. 7, 5(1)(a)—-Indian Evidence Act,1872 — Sec. 65B, 27 — complainant, was the partner of a firm — notice issued to the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09 as pending in the office of A1, to finalize —presence of the independent witnesses , a telephonic conversation between PW1 and A2, which was recorded in aDVR and transferred to a CD- PW1, alleged informed A2 that he had in his possession —acceptance of the bribe and the recovery of the envelope with the marked cash was made from the body of A2—sufficient corroboration available from the independent witnesses, believe the trap having been successful as deposed by PW1 and PW2-accused , accepted the bribe the accused was stunned and did not reply and kept mum - PW2, the independent witness also corroborated the fact .

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Sec. 302, 201 —Murder define—Causing disapperarance of evidence of offence or giving false information to screen offender— Evidence Act, 1872—Sec. 27—How much information received from accused may be proved- Trial Court and the High Court have rightly appreciated the evidence placed on record by the prosecution and have correctly determined the culpability of the appellant for the murder of the deceased— Appeal is devoid of merit and is accordingly dismissed.

Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2000 —Sec. 87 —Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 —Sec. 103 — a meeting of General Body shall be convened for reconstitution of such societies and with consent of both the States, proposal shall be sent for their reorganization -Respondent No.1's , who is a cane grower of village, Suar, was not included in the list of members of the society— parent State has undergone reorganisation- Respondents, failed to follow the scheme , amendments carried out in byelaws of the Society are illegal- a meeting of General Body shall be convened for reconstitution of such societies and with consent of both the States, proposal shall be sent for their reorganization — reconstitute and reorganize the societies as their area of operation fell within the States of Uttar Pradesh and Uttaranchal — conceptual distinction between 'objects' and 'area of operation' and residence of the members or the geographical spread of activity cannot substitute — action for reorganisation of the Societies taken and the Society whose objects and area of operation are confined to a single State.

a Sinha Vs. State of Bihar & Anr. JN:(Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.) Appearances: HN:Constitution of India,1950 — Art. 12 and 14, 254(1), 300A — Indian Trusts Act — Sec. 3 —Sachchidanand Sinha Library (Requisition & Management) Act, 2015— Sec. 2(a) and (b) —Institute & Library was founded in memory of his wife, offering a sum of ?50,000 from the sale proceeds of ancestral property belonging to her - formal Deed of Trust was executed and signed by all the trustees— an agreement was entered into between the Government of Bihar and the Trust- control and management of the institution and its property would continue to vest in the trustees, State Government would provide financial assistance to meet its expenses - a trust as "an obligation attached to the ownership of property, arising from a confidence reposed by the Settlor and accepted by the trustee"— rights of management and administration, shall stand restored to its pre-existing legal position .